Law enforcement agencies turned to technology in an effort to monitor individuals and enforce quarantine measures during the COVID-19 pandemic. 

However, these efforts have also raised concerns about privacy and the potential for abuse. One example of technology being used for police surveillance is facial recognition software. 

In China, for instance, authorities have deployed facial recognition cameras at entrances to residential compounds and public transportation hubs to identify people with fevers or who are not wearing masks. 

Similarly, in India, police have been using facial recognition software to identify and track people who have been ordered to quarantine.

Phone tracking has also been used by law enforcement in the fight against COVID-19. 

In the United States, for example, authorities in several states have used phone tracking data to monitor individuals who have been in close contact with confirmed cases of the virus. While some have praised these efforts as a necessary tool in the fight against the pandemic, others have criticized them as a violation of civil liberties.

There are clear potential risks and drawbacks to relying on technology for surveillance. 

One concern is the possibility of false positives, which can lead to innocent people being wrongly identified or targeted. Another is the potential for the technology to be used for other purposes beyond public health, such as political repression or social control. 

Privacy advocates have raised concerns about the long-term implications of using technology for police surveillance. They argue that such measures could set a precedent for the use of technology to monitor and control people's movements and behaviors in the future. 

Some have also pointed out that the use of technology for surveillance disproportionately affects marginalized communities, who may be more likely to be targeted or unfairly treated.

Ramlawi, who was 19 at the time, was one of hundreds of people who received a text message from the Israeli Government stating he had participated in the Al-Aqsa Mosque confrontations. 

The Al-Aqsa Mosque confrontations in May 2021 sparked some of the worst violence Israel had seen in a long time. The Shin Bet started harassing Arab residents and individuals whom it suspected of taking part in violent altercations with police.

Ramlawi was concerned that the surveillance put in place to halt COVID-19 will represent a long-term threat to the citizens of east Jerusalem.

The use of technology by the Shin Bet in Israel has raised concerns about privacy and civil liberties as well as doubts about its accuracy.

Hundreds of Arabs in Jerusalem, according to Gil Gan-Mor, an attorney with the non-profit Association for Civil Rights in Israel, got the menacing message, that 

“You have been spotted as having participated in acts of violence in the Al-Aqsa Mosque. We will hold you accountable.”

After Gan-organization Mor's filed a lawsuit, Shin Bet sent numerous people warning texts, but it didn't apologize. The use of the technology was upheld by Israel's attorney general, despite difficulties and the fact that some messages were sent to a few unintended recipients.

Yang Jiahao had supper with a handler and purchased a train ticket to Beijing at the beginning of September. Yang was put under quarantine the following morning when Guangzhou health officials revealed a COVID-19 case less than a kilometer from where they had dinner.

Yang's case was transferred to city-level officials by the Guangzhou police. 

Police took Xu Zhihao to quarantine after his QR code went red while uploading his itinerary to obtain the Henan province health code. He and three others discovered that several 

Because the provinces have begun sharing information, the local health codes may continue to exist after China reverses its lockdowns. In the future, could these apps might be used to keep an eye on people?

Law enforcement and intelligence agencies in India have redirected facial recognition and artificial intelligence technology to tackle COVID-19.

As the pandemic spread in early 2020, authorities began photographing people who were disobeying the mask law or who were just carelessly donning masks. The city has invested hundreds of millions of dollars in patrol cars, CCTV cameras, geo-tracking software, facial recognition software, and numerous facial recognition cameras.

The Telangana state police chief tweeted in May 2020 about his agency implementing AI-based software that uses CCTV to focus in on persons who aren't wearing masks. A year later, cops tweeted pictures of themselves using handheld tablets and facial recognition software to scan people's faces.

A social activist in Hyderabad named claims that police ordered him to take off his mask during the COVID-19 uprising last year and then took pictures of him wearing it. He is currently suing to learn the reason his picture was taken.

Facial recognition technology was not utilized in Masood's case, according to police, who said that it is only used when a crime or suspected crime is being investigated. Lawyers for Masood are preparing a reply.

In India, privacy activists are concerned that increased measures in response to the pandemic may permit 360 degree surveillance, in which housing, welfare, health, and other types of data are combined to construct a profile.

During the height of the pandemic, conservative former Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison appointed himself minister of five different ministries and launched both federal and state-level apps to alert individuals when they had been in close proximity to someone who tested positive for the virus.

In order to look into the murder of motorcycle gang leader Nick Martin, Australian law enforcement obtained the data of 2,439 drag racing spectators who visited a speedway in Perth in December 2020. All-traditional police methods, such as footprint matching, telephone tracking, and finally a confession, were used to solve the crime.

To assure adherence to COVID regulations, the federal government in the United States expanded its toolkit for surveillance, awarding contracts totaling $24.9 million to the data mining and surveillance firm Palantir Technologies Inc. The protocols looked to lack information security measures and usage limitations.

In order to study the impact of border closures, an emergency measure enacted by the Trump administration and maintained by President Joe Biden, the Centers for Disease Control purchased cellphone location data last year.

For public health research, the CDC acquired aggregated, anonymized data with strong privacy protections, but it remained unclear if the agency was still utilizing the information. 

In conclusion, surveillance technology can pose a threat to individual freedoms and serve as a catalyst for autocratic regimes. The use of technology for police surveillance, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, has raised concerns about privacy and the potential for abuse. There is a risk that such measures could set a precedent for the use of technology to monitor and control people's movements and behaviors in the future. Furthermore, the use of technology for surveillance disproportionately affects marginalized communities, who may be more likely to be targeted or unfairly treated.

It is important to carefully consider the potential risks and benefits of using technology for police surveillance, and to ensure that it is not used in a way that undermines civil liberties or disproportionately impacts certain groups of people. While technology can be a useful tool in the fight against COVID-19 and other challenges, it is crucial to maintain a balance between public health and individual freedoms. Any use of technology for police surveillance should be subject to strict oversight and accountability to ensure that it is used in a responsible and ethical manner.

https://apnews.com/article/technology-police-government-surveillance-covid-19-3f3f348d176bc7152a8cb2dbab2e4cc4

The Covid-19 Pandemic has boosted surveillance technology worldwide

2 Comments